• Earth Science Journal!
    Climate Change


    Global temperatures have been recorded since 1850.

     1. Over the past 175 years, how many of the record hottest global years do you think you have experienced?
    Take a guess.


    The image below represents 15 years (red) scattered through 170 years.

    168
    If things were random, things might look like the above.
    If you were 15 or 16, you might expect to have lived through one or two record-breaking years if the hottest years were simply random.

    Hint: They are Not random!


    So, according to global temperature records, how many measured hottest years have there been in your lifetime?
    Count how many you have lived through!

    Rank
    1 = Warmest
    From: 1850–2024
    Year
    1 2024
    2 2023
    3 2016
    4 2020
    5 2019
    6 2015
    7 2022
    8 2017
    9 2021
    10 2018
    11 2014
    12 2010
    13 2013
    14 2005
    15 2009
    16 2012
    17 2007
    18 2006
    19 2003
    20 2011

    Answer: All of them!
    Record extremes are normal for you!
    Basically, all of your lifetime you have experienced record-breaking global temperatures.


    WMO confirms 2024 as the warmest year on record!

    https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-confirms-2024-warmest-year-record-about-155degc-above-pre-industrial-level#:~:text=There%20is%20a%20margin%20of,C%20due%20to%20differing%20methodologies.


    gloabljjaanomalies_gis_2023_chart

    2024GlobalTemps_Ano

    https://www.courthousenews.com/nasa-analysis-finds-2023-warmest-year-on-record/

    2024GlobalTemps_2024

    2024 was the world’s warmest year on record!

    https://www.noaa.gov/news/2024-was-worlds-warmest-year-on-record#:~:text=It's%20official%3A%202024%20was%20the,for%20Environmental%20Information%20(NCEI).


    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/climate/what-is-extreme-weather.html


    Extreme Weather Can Feel ‘Normal’ After Just a Few Years

    While unusual weather patterns have always come and gone, extreme weather events will become more frequent in a changing climate. 
    But if extreme temperatures arrived in your area, would you even notice?
    Often, the answer is no, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In it, researchers analyzed more than two billion Twitter messages to see how people reacted to weather events.
    In fact, the study suggests people learn to accept extreme weather as normal in as little as two years.
    That might lead people to underestimate the extent of global warming, given that it has already caused extreme temperature changes. If you were born after 1976, for example, the Earth has been warmer than the 20th-century average every year of your life.


    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513

    https://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/top-10-warmest-years-on-record
    2024 isn't over yet, but it is on course to break all previous records, just like last year!


    The global temperature records keep breaking!

    2. What is the difference between weather and climate?
    Read the following and answer in your own words.
    Why Cold Weather Doesn't Mean Global Warming Isn't Real

    Weather is what we see day-to-day. It explains changes in the atmosphere over short periods of time and is highly unpredictable. A sudden thunderstorm or blizzard is what we refer to as weather. Climate describes the average behavior of the atmosphere over long periods of time.


    Neil Degrass Tyson explains it well!

    The Science of Climate Change

    3. Are levels of CO2 really rising?
    We need proof!

    The Keeling Curve


    keeling1

    This is the Keeling Curve!

    Please write down and answer these questions.


    4. What does the Keeling curve show?
    It shows that the concentration of CO2 has increased (direct relationship)


    5. What has happened to the rate of change of CO2 concentration over time?
    The rate of change of CO2 has increased over time. 
    Steeper slope over time.
    It is quite obvious that CO2 levels are not only rising but rising even faster every year.
    That's why it's called a curve.


    6. Why do you think the line zig-zags?
    Seasonal changes cause CO2 rates to increase during our Fall and Winter.
    Trees lose their leaves.
    There is much more land vegetation n the Northern Hemisphere.

    keelingseasonal


    7. Does CO2 really absorb heat?
    Watch it absorb infrared heat from a flame.
     

    Explain why the candle appears to disappear!

    8. What is our current CO2 concentration?


    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-just-breached-the-410-ppm-threshold-for-co2/

    On Tuesday, April 17th, 2018, the Mauna Loa Observatory recorded its first-ever carbon dioxide reading in excess of 410 parts per million. Carbon dioxide hasn’t reached that height in millions of years. It’s a new atmosphere that humanity will have to contend with, one that’s trapping more heat and causing the climate to change at a quickening rate.

    420
    It just keeps on rising at an ever-increasing rate!
    What is it now?
    Take a guess.
    http://co2now.org/


    9. How does the current amount of CO2 compare with the deep past?

    CO2 is rising much quicker and is much higher than it has ever been in over 800,000 years.

    This is not normal!

    co2

    The peaks and valleys above show cycles of 8 ice ages and warming periods.
    Those are regular climate change cycles. 
    The high point at the end of the graph represents our current position in comparison.

    Today, we are almost double the level we should be regarding CO2 concentration. 
    We are off the charts!

    This is not part of our normal climate cycles!
    https://mashable.com/2018/05/03/co2-highest-level-human-history/#tW70BFYGHsqE


    10. Are humans really causing Climate Change?

     

    There is no debate in the Scientific Community regarding the fact that the Earth is warming and that humans are the cause.

    "This, in short, is the "smoking gun" that proves the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere is caused by humans burning fossil fuel. It's not a conjecture or a model or a prediction; it's a measurement that anyone can reproduce."

    https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4549


    11. How is Climate Change linked to past mass extinctions?
     
     

    Watch the above and explain.
    In the past, massive volcanic events triggered the release of large quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere, leading to significant climate change and mass extinctions.


    12. Today, what is giving off large amounts of CO2?

     

    Make sure you watch the above and explain.
    We are!


    Bonus Opportunity!
    Do this experiment yourself and collect your own data.

    Are you smarter than a 5th grader?

     

    You are not done!
    Be sure to continue finishing your journal!


    Berkeley study directly IDs climate change culprit
    By David Perlman

    http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Berkeley-experts-study-strengthens-human-link-6101054.php

    Scientists training their instruments on the skies have caught the world’s major greenhouse gas right in the act of warming the planet, researchers reported Wednesday, providing the first direct evidence that human activity is dangerously altering the environment.

    The instruments captured more than a decade of rising surface temperatures, changes that were directly triggered by the atmosphere’s increasing burden of carbon dioxide, a team of scientists from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and UC Berkeley reported.


    Feedback Loops

    (we know not what we trigger)

    albedo

    The Albedo Effect


    It is important to understand that all of these triggers are happening simultaneously and that these are only a few of the relationships we know about.
    There are probably many other climate interactions that we have yet to anticipate.
    These triggers can lead to a runaway greenhouse effect, making the climate changes we see today look very trivial.

    Get more details below.


    Ocean Acidification: Global warming's evil twin

    oceansink

    While there's much focus on the impacts of warming temperatures, there's another more direct effect of burning fossil fuels and deforestation. More than 30% of the carbon dioxide emitted by humans is dissolved into the oceans, gradually turning ocean water more acidic. Coral reef researcher Ove Hoegh-Guldberg explains the threat of ocean acidification: "Evidence gathered by scientists around the world over the last few years suggests that ocean acidification could represent an equal – or perhaps even greater threat – to the biology of our planet than global warming." Thus, a new paper, Paleo-perspectives on ocean acidification, labels ocean acidification as the 'evil twin' of global warming.

    As CO2 dissolves in the oceans, it leads to a drop in pH. This change in seawater chemistry affects marine organisms and ecosystems in several ways, especially organisms like corals and shellfish, whose shells or skeletons are made from calcium carbonate. Today, the surface waters of the oceans have already been acidified by an average of 0.1 pH units from pre-industrial levels, and we're seeing signs of its impact even in the deep oceans.

    The past gives us an insight into the future effects of ocean acidification as we continue to emit more CO2 and acidify the ocean even further. Ice cores give us accurate data on the evolution of CO2 in the atmosphere over the last 800,000 years. These reconstructions, together with data derived from foraminifera, find that the pH of ocean surface water was lower during interglacials (high levels of atmospheric CO2). Seawater pH was also higher during glacial periods when atmospheric CO2 was low. Correspondingly, foraminifera seems to have grown thicker or thinner shells over glacial-interglacial timescales in time with changing CO2 levels.

    Figure 1: Glacial–interglacial variability in surface water pH (filled blue symbols, note the reversed axis), superimposed on atmospheric CO2 concentration during the last 800,000 years (magenta curve).

    Current atmospheric CO2 is at greater levels than seen over the last 800,000 years. Similarly, pH levels are already more extreme than those experienced by the oceans over this same period. By the end of the 21st century, the projected decline in seawater pH is expected to be three times larger than any change in pH observed as the Earth’s climate has oscillated between glacial and interglacial periods. The times when seawater pH changed fastest was during glacial terminations when the Earth came out of an ice age. The change in seawater pH over the 21st Century is projected to be around 100 times faster than this rate.

    What will be the effect of seawater pH falling to such levels? Let's look further back at periods when pH fell to the levels projected for the end of the 21st Century. There have been several periods where pulses of CO2 have been injected into the atmosphere from volcanic activity or the melting of methane hydrates. One well-known example is the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), which occurred around 55 million years ago. During this event, global temperatures increased by over 5°C over a time frame of fewer than 10,000 years. This coincided with a massive release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which led to ocean acidification. This change caused a series of biological responses, including the mass extinction of foraminifera.

    Looking further back, there are other examples of mass extinctions coinciding with global warming and increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide.  Examination of the mass extinction that occurred 251 million years ago during the end-Permian find that the patterns of mortality are consistent with the physiological effects of elevated CO2 concentrations (along with the effects of global warming). 205 million years ago, at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, a sudden rise in the levels of atmospheric CO2 coincided with a major suppression of carbonate sedimentation, very likely related to ocean acidification. A similar situation occurred 65 million years ago during the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event. Most of the planktonic calcifying species became rare or disappeared.

    Future acidification depends on how much CO2 humans emit over the 21st century. By the year 2100, various projections indicate that the oceans will have acidified by a further 0.3 to 0.4 pH units, more than many organisms like corals can stand. This will create conditions not seen on Earth for at least 40 million years.


    A ‘megadrought’ will grip the U.S. in the coming decades.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/todays-drought-in-the-west-is-nothing-compared-to-what-may-be-coming/2015/02/12/0041646a-b2d9-11e4-854b-a38d13486ba1_story.html

    NASA scientists studied past droughts and climate models incorporating soil moisture data to estimate future drought risk. According to NASA's study, "droughts in the U.S. Southwest and Central Plains during the last half of this century could be drier and longer than drought conditions seen in those regions in the last 1,000 years."

    The long and severe drought in the U.S. Southwest pales in comparison with what’s coming: a “megadrought” that will grip that region and the central Plains later this century and probably stay there for decades, a new study says.

    Thirty-five years from now, if the current pace of climate change continues, those areas of the country will experience a weather shift that will linger for as long as three decades, according to the study, released Thursday.

    Researchers from NASA and Cornell and Columbia universities warned of major water shortages and conditions that dry out vegetation, which can lead to monster wildfires in southern Arizona and parts of California.


    Global warming rises, and the soil dries up.
    dry
    http://business.rediff.com/slide-show/2010/oct/13/slide-show-1-global-warming-to-rise-soil-dries

    The soils in large swaths of the world, including vast areas of central India, Australia, Africa, and South America, have been drying up, a new study has found, warning that this could intensify global warming and reduce vegetation growth.
    The Oregon State University study, which looked at the natural phenomenon of "evapotranspiration" on a global scale, discovered that important regions in the Southern Hemisphere are losing their soil moisture and drying up.
    Evapotranspiration, or the movement of water from the land to the atmosphere, is a key component of the global climate system.
    It returns about 60 percent of annual precipitation back to the atmosphere, in the process, using more than half of the solar energy absorbed by land surfaces.
    The new research, the first to examine evapotranspiration on a global scale, proves that climate models predicting an increase in the phenomenon of global warming are true, LiveScience reported.
    The researchers, who examined the phenomenon between 1982 and late 1990s, found that by 1998 most soils in South America began showing signs that this process was still operational.
    Other large areas only lost a minimal amount of water to the phenomenon. Because the data only goes back for a few decades, the researchers said they can't be certain whether the change is part of climate's natural variability or a longer-lasting global change.
    One possibility, though, is that on a global level, a limit to the acceleration of the hydrological cycle -- the transfer of water between land, air, and sea -- on land has already been reached. If that's the case, the consequences could be serious, the researchers said in a paper published in the journal Nature.
    The effects, according to them, could include reduced terrestrial vegetation growth, less carbon absorption, a loss of the natural cooling mechanism provided by evapotranspiration, more heating of the land surface, more intense heat waves, and a "feedback loop" that could intensify global warming.
    "We didn't expect to see this shift in evapotranspiration over such a large area of the Southern Hemisphere," said study co-author Beverly Law, a professor at Oregon State University.
    "It is critical to continue such long-term observations because until we monitor this for a longer period of time, we can't be sure why this is occurring."
    According to the researchers, some of the areas with the most severe drying included much of Australia, central India, large parts of South America, southeast Africa, and some of Indonesia. Most of these regions are historically dry, but some are actually tropical rainforests.

    Wildfires add to the speed of global warming

    fires

    Wildfires ravaging California and other major forested areas worldwide are speeding the pace of global warming as they pump more and more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
    And the planet's rising temperatures that spur droughts and hotter summers, in turn, are sparking even more widespread fires.
    Those warnings come from an international team of fire specialists from six nations, who declare that the global science agency that governs international actions aimed at reversing climate change must include the effects of forest fires in predicting how fast temperatures will rise in coming years.
    The report on wildfires and climate is being published today in the journal Science.
    One of the fire's most significant contributors to global warming is the thousands of acres deliberately torched each year - particularly in the tropics - to clear forested land for farms, according to three leading authors of the study who spoke Thursday in a teleconference organized by the National Science Foundation.
    That kind of deforestation accounts for about one-fifth of all the human-caused greenhouse gas emissions every year, the scientists agreed - and the proportion could become larger quickly as more and more land is cleared by burning, said Thomas Swetnam of the University of Arizona in Tucson.
    "It's very clear that fire is a primary catalyst of global climate change," Swetnam said. "In the light of increased global warming, we'll be seeing more and longer droughts, and with more hot and dry years, we'll be seeing still more and larger fires."
    "Fire affects the world in subtle and often misunderstood ways," said David Bowman of Australia's University of Tasmania. "It can change the climate quickly with large emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants."
    One of those pollutants, the scientists agreed, is the black carbon soot that falls windblown over large areas of the Earth from major forest fires or deliberate "deforestation" blazes. The scientists said that soot on the ground absorbs the sun's radiant energy - thus heating swaths of ground and adding to the burden of global warming.
    Jennifer K. Balch of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at UC Santa Barbara noted that a consortium of scientists known as the IPCC - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - has in the past limited the role of wildfires in its assessments of climate change.
    The panel's periodic reports form the basis of treaties and government actions to curb global warming, and Balch said the new report in Science should persuade the panel to include a greater role for the impact of wildfires in its next assessment of global warming due in three years.
    "There are fires now where we don't normally see fires," she said, "and there are bigger and more frequent fires throughout the Western United States and the tropics."
    In California alone, fires last year covered 380,310 acres in the state's wildlands protected by the California Department of Forestry, but the five-year average was far lower, totaling fewer than 260,800 acres, according to the department's figures.


    Fire and Ice!

    How does melting permafrost feedback on Global Warming?

    In the vast landscape of eastern Siberia, there is a massive hole in the ground known as the "doorway to the underworld" triggered by climate change in recent decades. The permafrost ground near the Yana River Basin has been warming lately, causing large-scale local topography and ecological changes.
    The tadpole-shaped crater, the Batagaika crater, is known as a "megaslump" and is related to karsting triggered through permafrost melting. Currently, the crater measures 0.6 miles long and 282 feet deep. However, the crater's growth has increased recently, prompting locals to nickname it the "doorway to the underworld" and to avoid the area.

    Batagaika

    Permafrost is ground that remains at or below freezing temperatures for more than two years. This is common in the high latitudes of Siberia, where average yearly temperatures prevent warming of the ground to above freezing. Pore spaces within the soil contain trapped water, which can be frozen in place for thousands of years in the case of northern latitudes.
    The recent accelerated melting of permafrost is linked to climate change and the increase in average global temperatures for the past decades. Permafrost acts to preserve the sediment, dead plant, and animal material within the soil and bury it deeply. However, upon melting permafrost, bacteria are given a pathway to break down vast amounts of organic materially previously inaccessible.
    This increases residual methane and carbon dioxide emissions from bacterial decomposition in permafrost melting areas. This perpetuates a positive feedback loop whereby increasing greenhouse gas emissions increase global temperatures, which in turn melts more permafrost, allowing for more organic matter decay and additional CO2 and methane emissions. The presence of well-known global and ecosystem-wide positive feedback loops is a foundation of why scientists see Earth as having tipping points.


    siberia

    How global warming could turn Siberia into a giant crater ‘time bomb’
    http://siberiantimes.com/science/casestudy/news/n0076-how-global-warming-could-turn-siberia-into-a-giant-crater-time-bomb/
    Click the above link for the whole story.
    By Anna Liesowska & Derek Lambie

    Scientists say there is growing evidence that rising temperatures were catalysts for massive unexplained holes in the ground. Global warming could leave parts of Siberia exposed to a wave of underground explosions like those behind the recent unexplained giant craters phenomenon.

    Scientists studying one of the massive holes on the Yamal Peninsula say there is growing evidence that rising temperatures are the main catalyst triggering the blasts. They believe warming air is melting the thick permafrost, accumulating and releasing volatile 'fire ice' gases, which then explode to create giant funnels.


    Dozens of new craters suspected in northern Russia
    By Anna Liesowska

    http://siberiantimes.com/science/casestudy/news/n0127-dozens-of-mysterious-new-craters-suspected-in-northern-russia/
    Click the above link for the whole story.

    Respected Moscow scientist Professor Vasily Bogoyavlensky has called for 'urgent' investigation of the new phenomenon amid safety fears.

    Until now, only three large craters were known about in northern Russia with several scientific sources speculating last year that heating from above the surface due to unusually warm climatic conditions, and from below, due to geological fault lines led to a huge release of gas hydrates, so causing the formation of these craters in Arctic regions. 

    Two of the newly-discovered large craters - also known as funnels to scientists - have turned into lakes, revealed Professor Bogoyavlensky, deputy director of the Moscow-based Oil and Gas Research Institute, part of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 

    Examination using satellite images has helped Russian experts understand that the craters are more widespread than was first realized, with one large hole surrounded by as many as 20 mini-craters!


    Reflection
    What did you find most important about Climate Change? Why?
    What do you think should be done about Climate Change? Why?